mrblarney
Junior Member
Darth Odium
Posts: 88
|
Post by mrblarney on May 9, 2012 3:42:51 GMT -5
warban seems to be suggesting that the Jedi focus only on the still-neutral planets, with all Council Masters performing Lead actions. Perhaps someone else will come in to let loose more rope to allow the Jedis to continue to hang themselves with before either myself or Capfalcon provide our two cents.
Also, whomever updates the orders next, note that Nirya and Capfalcon posted at the same time; merge their orders, will ya?
|
|
farangu
New Member
Darth Malus
Posts: 42
|
Post by farangu on May 9, 2012 8:54:14 GMT -5
Since we have a much greater lockdown on planets right now, I wouldn't mind getting a few more kills for us. Blarney and Cap, keep an ear open for any that might fulfill our conditions for that.
|
|
figgy
Full Member
Darth Brooks
Posts: 136
|
Post by figgy on May 9, 2012 11:27:09 GMT -5
How do the votes go on the council proboard? Is the vote pretty much unanimous every time? How are they choosing their target?
|
|
mrblarney
Junior Member
Darth Odium
Posts: 88
|
Post by mrblarney on May 9, 2012 12:07:57 GMT -5
Well, people seem to be basing their votes on what happens in the thread, and there's usually a modest majority in terms of opinion. There isn't a whole lot of strife over that kind of thing.
Do we want to use our Tatooine kill to promote one of our Acolytes, isolate another Knight/Padawan pair, or kill off one of the lone Knights? In the first case, we get more useful power, but the maneuver is a little bold. In the second case, we don't gain much immediately, but any Sith Lords can use Crush Threat with more reliability. In the third case, we reduce the efficacy of Crush Threat, but we also reduce the amount of Influence that can be exerted by the Jedi.
|
|
segatai
New Member
Darth IEATYOUNGLINGS
Posts: 44
|
Post by segatai on May 9, 2012 12:23:49 GMT -5
I like promoting an acolyte or killing off a council member due to the added confusion adding a new member should bring.
|
|
figgy
Full Member
Darth Brooks
Posts: 136
|
Post by figgy on May 9, 2012 12:42:21 GMT -5
Mascara, you're going to need to pipe up a little bit more in the thread. You're barely making minimum requirements.
|
|
kime
Junior Member
Posts: 81
|
Post by kime on May 9, 2012 12:58:06 GMT -5
I like the idea of maneuvering to get some really effective Crush Threats, but that's always a bit of a gamble.
|
|
figgy
Full Member
Darth Brooks
Posts: 136
|
Post by figgy on May 9, 2012 13:17:36 GMT -5
Oh, and if Obi is counting BBcode fuck-ups and what not, Blasphemer and Tzeentch both have an inactivity strike from last night.
Tzeen voted, but it was "EARTH WIND WATER", etc. I know he meant CaptainPlanet, but would that have counted as an actual vote?
|
|
capfalcon
Junior Member
Darth Darth Nefarious
Posts: 86
|
Post by capfalcon on May 9, 2012 13:24:50 GMT -5
I like the idea of maneuvering to get some really effective Crush Threats, but that's always a bit of a gamble. Crush threat seems kind of meh, to me. It's only one kill, and its only if we get lucky enough to pick the planet that an unsupported knight goes to.
|
|
figgy
Full Member
Darth Brooks
Posts: 136
|
Post by figgy on May 9, 2012 13:27:31 GMT -5
I like the idea of maneuvering to get some really effective Crush Threats, but that's always a bit of a gamble. Crush threat seems kind of meh, to me. It's only one kill, and its only if we get lucky enough to pick the planet that an unsupported knight goes to. If we know where a knight is going to whom we have an Acolyte attached, bingo bango. Unfortunately, their current strategy is "everyone pick a random planet and then report after vote close" I mean, fortunately. Since there is no jedi organization and they're going to have a really hard time capturing planets that way. Do the Jedi also get a number of points to distribute to planets, or is based solely on the Knights/Masters movements?
|
|
kime
Junior Member
Posts: 81
|
Post by kime on May 9, 2012 13:32:53 GMT -5
From everything we've heard so far, just the Missions and Leading and such. No pool of points.
I doubt Obi will count BBCode mistakes as inactivity strikes. Seems a bit unnecessarily harsh. The point of inactivity rules is to make sure people, you know, stay active. Which they obviously are.
Beyond that, inactivity is handled slightly differently: two posts, a vote, private actions. You only need to of three to stay active.
|
|
figgy
Full Member
Darth Brooks
Posts: 136
|
Post by figgy on May 9, 2012 13:34:44 GMT -5
So I can not vote at all and I'm still active? Seems weird.
|
|
kime
Junior Member
Posts: 81
|
Post by kime on May 9, 2012 13:39:52 GMT -5
Weird, but here we are.
|
|
segatai
New Member
Darth IEATYOUNGLINGS
Posts: 44
|
Post by segatai on May 9, 2012 13:52:08 GMT -5
Someone mentioned a while back that Obi was being very loose with inactivity requirements, that as long as you were putting in orders you could sneak by. I figured that's why we are all required to repost our orders thread.
|
|
vert
Junior Member
Darth Lotus
Posts: 52
|
Post by vert on May 9, 2012 14:17:17 GMT -5
hey guys so me n MrT are supposedly hitting Matev tonight. I am suppose to challenge him while T meditates.
Also I think it would be fun to promote one of us...BUT at the same time we could try and leave it a little longer
|
|